![]() On the next page, you'll find the drive health report value under the Drive health section.Click on the Properties button below the drive's name line.On the next page, click the on the drive you want to check the SMART status for.On the right, click on the Manage Disks and Volumes link.However i need to understand better if this is the case and i will then need to inform Dell of the findings as they seem to think there is no issues on the two new drives.Known SMART attributes and status codes To Check Drive Health and SMART Status in Windows 10, ) This is the only explanation i have that if all the values are normalized and higher is indeed better, Maybe Dell gave me drives that have been refurbished and their relocated sector count is also 0. ( They take your old parts, Fix them and give them elsewhere. The only explanation have so far is that it is known for dell to Refurbish parts and then re-sell them or use them for warranty purposes. I dont understand, Am i reading the values wrong?, Is is possible for both the old set of drives and the brand new set of drives to have the same relocation sector count of 0, Is it possible it starts at 0 and goes up and only when it passes 70 is there an issue? If that is the case why do we keep getting the warning message for threshold reached in the Syslog files. smartd: (Drive name) REALLOCATED SECTOR CT below threshold (0 < 90) Both sets of drives display the warning in the sys log exactly besides the drive name When i check the drives we get the same values as the old. However when we installed the "Out the box" drives from dell, We immediately get the same error messages. (considering it possibly started at about 200 ) So from that it makes sense to draw the conclusion that since the values are normalized, the Current value of 0 is very bad and is indeed lower than its threshold of 90. However on my output for Relocated Sector count the count or current absolute value is 0 and the threshold is 90. ![]() So from what i can find i understand the values of the S.M.A.R.T Are normalized, Thus Higher is better. We get 2 warning messages in the Syslog for both drives that is the following : Read Sectors TOT Count 93739000 N/A N/A N/A Write Sectors TOT Count 76960000 N/A N/A N/A Read Sectors TOT Count 44260000 N/A N/A esxcli storage core device smart get -d t10.NVMe_Dell_Express_Flash_PM1725b_1.6TB_AIC_332A000121382500 Write Sectors TOT Count 1334000 N/A N/A N/A When i run the S.M.A.R.T Command i get the following esxcli storage core device smart get -d t10.NVMe_Dell_Ent_NVMe_AGN_MU_AIC_1.6TB_920800019C382500 When I sent the Idrac logs to Dell they say that they cant see any issues with the drives. However these "New" drives seem to display the exact same errors as the old ones in the VMware environment We recently started having issues with them and got them replaced by the warranty. I have x 2, 1.6 TB NVME Dell drives in the R740 server that we use. Im wondering if you can help me with a similar issue. There were some efforts to get smartctl up and running, but everything unofficial. # esxcli storage core device smart get -d ID Parameter predict failures based on these (few) dataįor a normal SSD, i get a lot of information when using monitor the health (tbw, errrors, temperature) I'm using a Samsung 1725b NVMe on ESXi 7.0 and wonder what are people using to
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |